Women in Engineering

I’ve been in engineering for a quarter of a century now, and have worked in a number of places, both large and small. I’ve also spent time attending conferences, meetings and workshops; and, of course my career started after attending University. Over all that time there has been a distinct lack of women in the field. Without having exact figures to hand, I would say it has varied between 20% at best and zero at worst in all those different situations.

Can We Blame Engineers?

Clearly there’s a problem somewhere if there’s such a lack of women in engineering. I’ve never met a single male engineer who doesn’t want more women working with them. OK, there’s a lot of engineers who don’t want anyone else working with them, but they don’t discriminate when it comes to being anti-social. Even amongst my most lewd and politically-incorrect colleagues I’ve never met one who thinks women aren’t capable of doing the job. So I’ve seen very little evidence that the workplace and engineers themselves are off-putting to women. However, perceptions may differ from reality when looking from the outside. The media often portrays engineers as socially inept, introverted, either huddled over a computer, or getting themselves dirty on machinery. While there might be some elements of truth in any stereotype, engineers do come from a range of backgrounds with a wide variety of personalities and interests outside of their jobs. Some of them even shower more than once a week. But the media does have a lot to answer for when it comes to portrayal of engineers.

Who Gets Recruited?

So what about recruitment? To be honest, I haven’t been too involved with recruitment in my career, but have spoken to plenty of colleagues who have. While it depends very much on the position being advertised for, it isn’t unusual to receive 500 applications for one vacancy with only 5 women applying. So all things being equal, there’s a 1% chance a woman would get recruited. So either the problem lies in the process of job advertising or goes further back than that. Given that most job adverts aren’t placed in Loaded and Playboy magazine, we can probably discount any significant discrimination on that front. So we must step back further. My engineering course at university (a top-10 Russell group one, so a semi-humble brag) was around 95% male. Other engineering disciplines varied a bit, but still very much male dominated. So what’s holding back women from applying to university engineering courses?

Is It A School Problem?

In the UK, the traditional path into university is after taking A-levels at 18 years old, either at school or a 6th form college. Most people take 3 or 4 A-levels (it was only ever 3 in my day when they were a lot harder – but that’s another hot topic!), which are chosen at 16 years old. So at 16, you’re narrowing down your subjects to specialisms you’ll most likely be using to start your career. If you want to be an engineer one of those A-levels will be at least maths (yes, with an ‘s’!), and a science (physics being a good choice for many engineering disciplines). This doesn’t leave much space for a breadth of choices, so if you want to become an engineer you’re probably committed to that path at 16. If you want to leave your options open for other career paths, you might not be able to choose the A-levels required for an engineering career. Maybe at 16 boys tend to have a clearer idea of what career they want than girls do? It’ll be interesting to hear you views on this.

Before A-levels, there are of course the GCSEs, which are taken at 16 years old. Usually pupils take between 8-12 of them, and if I remember correctly I took 10. So there’s plenty more scope for a diversity of subjects there. I remember doing art, French, a science and geography amongst mine, so a good mix even if most of that knowledge as long since evaporated. At GCSE level there are a variety of subjects which help in the background to learning about engineering, such as maths, physics, chemistry, computer science and design & technology (I going by the names they were called when I was at school a long time ago!). From my memory, the male to female ratio did vary a lot in these. Maths was compulsory, but girls dominated the top set, so clearly not a lack of ability there. However, computer science and design & technology was pretty much entirely male. So the polarisation of the genders had already set in at that stages. I don’t remember any girls being discouraged by teachers from taking these subjects, so what put them off? Was it peer pressure, lack of interest, parental influence, or the general stereotype of gendered subjects?


When I was a lad, many many years ago, I was constant tinkerer. Whether making Airfix models, building machines with technical Lego, constructing electronics circuits or writing BASIC programs on my early 80s home computer; they was rarely a time where I wasn’t building or designing something. I learnt so much from this play, that it made much of my formal education much easier as I had gathered the basics at home at a younger age. In those pre-internet days, much of the information was gathered from magazines and from my dad who was also very practical. Some of my school friends also had similar hobbies, and we often swapped ideas and proudly showed off our creations to each other. However, I don’t remember any female friends or sisters really having any similar hobbies, with even Lego being considered a boys toy back then (despite it being very non-gendered in those days). They simply didn’t seem interested in such pastimes and would rather do more ‘girlie’ things.

I certainly wasn’t forced into the hobbies I did, and much of it was really from taking an interest in what my dad was doing. Having said that, I also enjoyed helping my mum with baking and she encouraged my more artistic side (which I’ve long since lost). My sisters were simply not interested in what my dad was up to, but he never said they shouldn’t take an interest in those things.

So I think if you want girls to consider engineering and STEM in general, they really need to be exposed to interesting hobbies when young. Looking at my own children I would say they really start to specialise in interests around the age of 6 to 8. Both my children (one of each) love their Lego, but do play in rather different ways. The girl is very much into building houses where her figures have distinct personalities and do quite real-world things. Whereas the boy is very much into goodies and baddies, and building things that fly or drive. However, both are actively building and designing their models, so they are both engineering. I try to ensure there’s plenty of practical things around for them to play with, but try not to force anything on them, and certainly don’t tell them they should play with something as it’s only for boys/girls. So if you have a girl, make sure there’s plenty of opportunities for her to access practical toys and technology that allows creativity and logical thinking. Also, make sure you as a parent (or friend, or relative) are seen doing practical and creative things and be ready to get them to join in with you, or at least talk to them about it.


There’s a fine line between encouragement, where a child is doing something willingly and enjoying it, and hot-housing a child into something a parent wants them to excel at. Children can quite easily dive into something with massive enthusiasm for a few weeks or days and then lose interest and never come back to it again. Occasionally some activities will stick and they’ll persist with them for much longer. I’m sure we’ve seen toys that are always out and others which get used once and collect dust in the back of the cupboard. It’s important to spot which activities an child takes an interest in and encourage them along, particularly if it is something which is enhancing their development. However, if you get too forceful with this encouragement, it can put them off and they’ll end up never wanting to do it again. Sometimes its difficult to tell how forceful you are if it’s something you’ve got an enthusiasm for yourself. But, never try and put children off from doing things, particularly if they start to feel it is something they shouldn’t be doing through peer pressure.

So to start to get more girls into engineering, they need encouragement at a very young age to take up hobbies and in their play. But you should never force them into things if they show no interest in them. I’d much rather see a girl who is a passionate fashion designer than a reluctant engineer. But if she does show interest in engineering and science, make sure it isn’t only in school where she gets to learn about it, give her all the encouragement you can. It becomes particularly important through the adolescent years when peer pressure and hormones can pull them away.

Will We Ever Reach 50%?

To be brutally honest, I don’t think we’ll ever see engineering being 50% female. My main reasons for this do come from observing how children play, and despite many people’s efforts to not restrict play along gender lines, generally speaking girls and boys do play differently. However, that doesn’t mean we should just give up, as there are plenty of girls how there who would take to engineering brilliantly and they should be encouraged. So we need parents and teachers to really show the way and ensure girls are given the opportunities to learn and enjoy engineering-related activities, and that they retain this while growing up. So I think we can increase the number of female engineers, but it’ll take a long time and the focus should be on the young and not on employers’ recruitment methods.


4 thoughts on “Women in Engineering”

  1. I like this post a lot because it has raised a question that is currently being debated about in my country. There are very few female engineers in Kenya despite more girls qualifying for Engineering courses in recent times.
    Personally, I think it’s basically how men and women are designed. Men are practical, women are intuitive. Not to imply that the few female engineers are lacking in intuition though or are manly.
    I was raised by very culturally attuned parents despite being a late 80s baby. So from childhood, we knew which games were for girls and which for boys. And our parents were very specific on defining that from a young age. As I was growing up, fewer girls were getting A grades in their final high school exams. Which meant fewer women were getting admitted to campus for the big 5(As we like to jokingly call the serious courses): Architecture, Engineering, Medicine, Pharmacy, Acturial Science Courses. And basically it was because of this gender defining business based on career choices that was kind of hindering the girls from performing.
    Nowadays stuff has changed in my country with so many girls getting As but still many steer clear of Engineering as a course. And that’s why my conclusion is the practicality of it is not really a woman thing.
    I sucked in Sciences at school and I remember my dad getting annoyed when he heard of my subject choices. I didn’t really get his reaction cuz I knew I wasn’t good at Physics and the likes. I was more into humanities and languages and I knew I would be comfortable choosing those as my specialization. With all that writing I was doing while growing up, it would have been highly unusual for me to end up in an Engineering class.
    Being a woman, I feel like a huge chunk of our gender is gifted in things requiring less practicality but more of intuition. And that’s why you find many women in interior design, journalism, hospitality, customer care, law etc. etc.
    Not to mean that we are less intelligent but our whole make up as women tends to subconsciously influence our career paths.


  2. Hey EngineeringDad, thought-provoking read! It’s interesting to hear how over the course of your career you haven’t seen much change in regards to the number of women in the engineering industry. My campaign is focused on exploring the underrepresentation of women in STEMM, primarily in Australia and found it insightful to hear what it’s like in the UK, and also Kenya from the comments section.

    Your point that “if you want to become an engineer you’re probably committed to that path at 16” rings true in the Australian landscape too because many girls don’t choose subjects that are prerequisites to study engineering in University. I don’t necessarily think that boys have a clearer idea of what they want to do when they’re older at this age – but I do think it is deeply ingrained in society, for example, that science and maths are male-dominated subjects, and so teenage girls may feel they don’t belong in the class, or not want to be the only girl in the class, therefore not choosing it. It’s a vicious cycle. Educators, parents and wider society need to shift their mindset and find creative ways to promote these subjects to girls so more of them consider careers in STEMM.

    To the person that commented above, I have to disagree that the gender gap in STEMM and engineering is due to “how men and women are designed”. I believe it is a much more complicated problem than boiling it down to our genetic makeup. At the end of the day we are all different and we all have different interests, no matter what gender we are. Women are deterred from entering these fields for many reasons, including unconscious biases that have developed over the course of their lifetimes that make them question whether those industries are for them, media and societal portrayal that these fields are for boys, fear of isolation about being the only, or one of few women, and additional organisational challenges.

    This issue is definitely something that is on the radar nationally, within industry and even in the education sector, so I do believe that over time we will get closer to achieving gender equality as long as these initiatives keep on going

    Feel free to check out my blog – I discuss some of the issues related to women in STEMM and this week have focused specifically on engineering.



    1. Thanks for reading my blog, and your interesting comments. It sounds like Australia and the UK are rather similar, and I would expect that being culturally very close countries. At school, when I did my A-levels, there were more girls in my maths class than boys, and I don’t think maths was really considered a male subject back then (in the 1980s). In my physics class, we only had 4 pupils (all boys), so too small to make any gender-based assumption; but it did seem science was unpopular for both boys and girls back then!
      Looking at my primary school age daughter at the moment, she really enjoys science, and it’s her best subject at school. It’ll be interesting to see whether this interest remains when the hormones kick in and peer pressure and self-image becomes more of an influence.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s